About MoCAP            2002 Reports/Updates           Assessment Data            Program Standards

 

COMPREHENSIVE DATA BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

As part of new state standards of data analysis for MoCAP, the following bibliography is presented with specific usages for each individual section of Lamar’s MoCAP Update.  Whenever possible, internet web links are provided to the data sources.  Additionally, a comprehensive survey conducted by Lamar Community Betterment guided efforts for many of the sub-sections represented.  A copy of this survey is provided at the end of the bibliography. 

 

Title:   Lamar Community Betterment Survey – 2002  (Shortcut)
Source:   Lamar Community Betterment Council/Barton County Chamber of Commerce
Sections Used:  ALL

Title:  BCAWS Countywide Health Needs Assessment – 1998 & 2001

Source:  Barton County Achieving Wellness & Security/Barton County Health Department

Sections Used:  1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 4.3

Title:  Community Data Profiles
http://www.dhss.state.mo.us/GLRequest/CountyProfile.html

Source:   Missouri Department of Health and Human Services

Sections Used:   Sections 1.1-1.3, 4.1, 4.3, 5.5

Title:  Kids Count in Missouri – 2001 Key Facts by County
http://oseda.missouri.edu/kidscount/01/facts/html/29011.html

Source:  Office of Socio-Economic Data Analysis/University of Missouri

Sections Used:  1.1 – 1.3, 4.1, 4.4

Title:  Business & Industry Focus Groups

Source:  Barton County Chamber of Commerce

Sections Used: 1.3, 2.1 – 2.5, 2.7-2.10, 5.5

Title:  EXCEL Annual Program Surveys

Source:  EXCEL Leadership Development Program through University Extension and the Chamber of Commerce

Sections Used:  1.8

Title:  Lamar Community Profile
http://www.bartoncounty.com/profile.htm

Source:  Missouri LocationOne/Missouri Department of Economic Development

Sections Used:  2.1 – 2.5, 2.7 – 2.8, 3.4, 4.5, 5.1 – 5.5, 5.7

Title:  Lamar Baseline Study 1996-2006

Source:  Commissioned by the City of Lamar from Rural Policy Research Institute of Iowa State University, University of Missouri, and the University of Nebraska

Sections Used:  2.1 – 2.10, 3.1, 3.2, 5.5

Title:  The Self-Sufficiency Standard:  Necessary Wages for Necessary Needs
http://www.ded.state.mo.us/business/researchandplanning/community/welfare/self-suffc.shtml

Source:  MERIC Office of Missouri Department of Economic Development

Sections Used:  2.1, 2.7

Title:  Chamber of Commerce Annual Membership Benefits Survey – 2002

Source:  Barton County Chamber of Commerce

Sections Used:  2.2 - 2.5, 2.7 – 2.9, 5.5

Title:  Lamar & Southwest Missouri Labor Study

Source:  Commissioned by the Southwest Missouri Development Alliance from Docking Institute of Ft. Hays, KS State University
http://65.65.230.205/swmoworkforcelabor2.htm

Sections Used: 2.7

Title:  Skills Assessment Survey for Southwest Missouri Employers

Source:  Commissioned by the Southwest Missouri Development Alliance from Docking Institute of Ft. Hays, KS State University (Available by request)

Sections Used:  2.7

Title:  Local Workforce Development Needs Survey

Source:  Barton County Chamber of Commerce

Sections Used:  2.7

Title:  Extension Council of Barton County Annual Assessment

Source:  University Outreach and Extension Council of Barton County

Sections Used:  2.10

Title:  Lamar Comprehensive Plan

Source:  Harry S Truman Council of Governments

Sections Used:  3.1 – 3.5, 4.1 – 4.7, 5.1 - 5.7

Title:  Missouri School Improvement Program Profile
http://www.dese.state.mo.us/planning/profile/006104.html

Source:  Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Sections Used:  4.4

Title:  Safe Drinking Water Information System
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/dwinfo/mo.htm

Source:   Environmental Protection Agency

Sections Used:   5.2

RESULTS OF THE LAMAR COMMUNITY SURVEY FOR MoCAP

As part of the ongoing update to Lamar’s potion of the Missouri Community Assessment Program (MoCAP), survey results have been tabulated to specify strengths and weaknesses for the community. The survey also provided an interesting perspective on what citizens would like to see available in the way of products and services for Lamar.

Much of the survey results come as no surprise to civic leaders. Respondents felt strongly that Lamar is a safe place to live and an ideal place to raise children. In fact, three-quarters of respondents said they would live in Lamar if they had to make the decision again in their lives.

The survey measured perceptions on the local economy, population, housing, public services, growth, population, and opportunity. Key areas for improvement were signaled for affordable housing, retail products, recreation, diversification, and opportunity for young adults.

Note:  More information on data sources used in the MoCAP reports will be compiled on this page as final reports are approved and submitted to the state. 


2002 Lamar MoCAP Survey Results

1.   Most Lamar residents are now better off financially than they were five years ago. 

 29% Agree     

 20% Disagree

 51% Unsure   

2.   Lamar is a good place to raise children.   

 91%
Agree 

 4%    Disagree

 5% Unsure  

3.   Lamar’s cost of living is higher than other communities in the Four-State Region. 

 30% Agree

 43% Disagree     

  27% Unsure

4.   Lamar’s population is growing at about the right pace.                          

 61%
Agree   

 11% Should Grow Faster

11% Should Grow Slower 

 17%
Unsure

 5.   Lamar has enough rental housing for middle-income families.                          

 8% Agree

 65%
Disagree

 27%
Unsure

6.   Lamar has enough home-buying opportunities for middle-income families. 

 23% Agree  

 55% Disagree 

22% Unsure 

7.   How would you rate your local health care services?  

 10% Excellent

 36%
Good  

 40%
Fair  

 11% Poor

3% Unsure 

8.   Overall, Lamar is a safe place to live. 

 92%
Agree          

2% Disagree 

 6%
Unsure

9.   If you had to make the decision again, would you return to Lamar to invest, live, or work? 

 75%
Yes  

 12%
No

 13% Unsure

10.  How would you rate these local services as to attitude and performance this past year?

Fire & Police:
                                                  

 31%
Excellent

 47%
Good

12%
Fair 

 4% Poor

6% Unsure 


City Utilities:  
                                                                 

 25%
Excellent   

46%
Good   

12%
Fair 

4% Poor 

 13%
Unsure


Parks/Recreation                                                               
                                                                                                                                         

 40%
Excellent       

42%
Good

12% Fair  

4% Poor 

2% Unsure 


TATS Taxi: 
 

 24%
Excellent

 31%
Good

4% Fair  

 11% Poor 

 30%
Unsure

News Media:                                                       

 10% Excellent

 36%
Good 

 40%
Fair

 7% Poor

 31%
Unsure

 

City Staff:      
 

 21%
Excellent 

 52%
Good

12%
Fair 

5% Poor 

 10% Unsure

 

Elected Officials:   
 

 18%
Excellent

 49%
Good

17%
Fair 

 5% Poor

 11 % Unsure


Chamber of Commerce:
                              

30%
Excellent
 

 45%
Good

11%
Fair 

3% Poor 

 4% Unsure


Public Education:
                                 

 28%
Excellent

51%
Good  

 14%
Fair

3% Poor 

 4% Unsure

11.  Do you feel the local economy is on a/an...

 10% Upswing

 58%
Stable

 10% Downtown

 22%
Unsure

12.  Lamar’s Downtown Square Shopping District is experiencing improvement.

 46% Agree

 29% Disagree

 25% Unsure

13.  How would you rate the general appearance of the community?

 20% Excellent

64% Good 

15% Fair  

 

1% Unsure
0% Poor

14.  Lamar has a good variety of shopping and entertainment.

 36%
Agree

 54%
Disagree 

10% Unsure 

15.  Lamar has a good variety of recreational and cultural activities.

56%
Agree

34%
Disagree 

10% Unsure 

16.  When considering job opportunities for the community, would you prefer:

 49% More jobs
at current wages  

 25% Fewer jobs
at higher wages 

 10% Unsure

17.  Lamar could benefit by having more opportunities available for young adults.

 89%
Agree

 

 10% Unsure

1% Disagree

18.  Lamar has adequate indoor space for meetings, conventions, and special events

 70%
Agree

20%
Disagree 

 10% Unsure

19.  Lamar should continue to diversify the economy with more, smaller businesses.   

66%
Agree
 

10% Disagree 

 24%
Unsure

20.  Please list any new services, products, or specific businesses that you would like to see available in Lamar. 

The most commonly requested item for question number 20 registered 40 different references wanting a YMCA-type facility for Lamar.  With 28 references in second place, survey respondents seemed to favor a roller skating rink as well.  Several references were made to the proposed Wal-mart Supercenter™.  Eighteen respondents specifically were in favor with 5 references specifically against the supercenter concept.  Twelve references were made for non-specific sit-down/dine-in/family-style restaurants.  Regarding specific brands of restaurants, 6 references were made for a Long John Silvers ™ and five references were made for a Burger King™.  Additionally, 5 of the survey respondents requested a shoe store and 4 references were made favoring night/weekend taxi service. 

Other items scoring less than three references each included:  Aldi™ store, government attitude, antiques, juice bar, attendant service stations for older or handicapped people, auto salvage yard, better bowling alley, auto parts for smaller cars, book store, variety store, clothing stores, baby/infant daycare, gymnastics, farm prices, game hall, Golden Corral™ restaurant, Dominos™ pizza restaurant, more doctors, better highway access, affordable rental housing, pet shop, podiatrist, restaurants on square, entertainment, JC Penny™  store, kids day at bowling alley, go-cart track, tutoring for school, steakhouse restaurant, Lowe’s™, Chuck-E-Cheese™ and other family restaurants, Schlotzsky’s™ Deli, bike trail, more mechanics, Petsmart™, Target™, Waffle House™, walking trail around city lake, rollerblading/skate path, dentist that accepts MC+, uniform shop.

Of the surveys tabulated, 189 were submitted by families with students in the Lamar Elementary School System.  An additional 68 surveys were submitted by the community in general.  The committee that devised and distributed the survey is comprised of Community Betterment President Rayma Davis, and CB Board Members Ginnie Keatts, Betty Kuhn, and Jasen Jones.  Work still continues on the 37 category updates required to renew the MoCAP and Lamar’s “All-Missouri Certified City” designation. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

About MoCAP            2002 Reports/Updates           Assessment Data            Program Standards

Contact Us              Feedback              Disclaimer              Return to Bartoncounty.com